Rainbow Quartz Publishing

Receiving conflicting feedback from multiple editors can be challenging and sometimes overwhelming. However, it’s important to remember that diverse perspectives can ultimately strengthen your manuscript. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to navigate and handle conflicting feedback effectively:

1. Stay Open-Minded

Approach all feedback with an open mind. Editors aim to improve your work, even if their opinions differ. Be willing to consider different viewpoints and how they might enhance your manuscript.

2. Review Feedback Thoroughly

Carefully read through all the feedback you’ve received. Take notes and identify the specific areas each editor has commented on, whether they are structural, character-related, or stylistic.

3. Identify Common Themes

Look for commonalities in the feedback. If multiple editors point out similar issues or praise the same aspects of your manuscript, these areas likely need attention.

• Recurring Issues: If several editors highlight a particular plot hole, character inconsistency, or pacing problem, prioritize addressing these.
• Consistent Praise: Take note of what multiple editors liked, as these are strengths you should preserve.

4. Evaluate the Feedback

Consider the nature of the feedback and the expertise of each editor. Weigh the comments based on the following factors:

• Expertise: Consider the editor’s experience, particularly in your genre. A seasoned editor’s insights might carry more weight.
• Specificity: Specific, actionable feedback is often more useful than vague comments. Prioritize detailed suggestions.
• Your Vision: Keep your original vision and goals for the manuscript in mind. Feedback should help you achieve your vision, not divert from it.

5. Determine Your Priorities

Decide which aspects of your manuscript are non-negotiable and which areas you are open to changing. Establishing these priorities will help you filter feedback effectively.

• Core Elements: Identify the core elements of your story that you are passionate about and want to retain.
• Flexible Areas: Recognize areas where you are more open to making changes based on feedback.

6. Seek a Second Opinion

If you’re unsure about conflicting feedback, consider seeking a second opinion from another trusted source, such as a beta reader, critique partner, or another editor.

• Beta Readers: Non-professional readers who can offer insights based on their reading experience.
• Critique Partners: Fellow writers who understand your genre and writing style.

7. Experiment with Changes

Don’t be afraid to experiment with different suggestions. You can revise sections based on conflicting feedback to see what works best for your manuscript.

• Trial and Error: Implement changes on a trial basis. If they enhance the manuscript, keep them; if not, revert to your original version or try a different approach.

8. Communicate with Editors

If possible, discuss the conflicting feedback with your editors. They may offer additional context or clarify their suggestions, helping you make more informed decisions.

• Clarification: Ask for more details on why they made specific suggestions.
• Discussion: Share your thoughts and concerns with them to find common ground.

9. Trust Your Instincts

Ultimately, you are the author and the final decision-maker for your manuscript. Trust your instincts and choose the feedback that aligns best with your vision and improves your story.

• Author’s Intuition: Your intuition as a writer is valuable. Trust it to guide you in making the right choices for your manuscript.

10. Document Changes

Keep track of the changes you make based on feedback. This helps maintain organization and allows you to see the evolution of your manuscript.

• Revision Log: Document the changes you make and the reasons behind them.
• Version Control: Save different versions of your manuscript to track revisions and revert if needed.

Handling conflicting feedback from multiple editors requires careful consideration, open-mindedness, and a clear focus on your vision for the manuscript. By thoughtfully evaluating each piece of feedback and trusting your instincts, you can navigate conflicting advice and enhance your book.

At Rainbow Quartz Publishing, we support authors in their revision process and strive to provide constructive, balanced feedback. For more resources on refining your manuscript and navigating the publishing process, visit us at RQPublishing.com.